Rename xref field in camelCase. Fix GNP-5564.
Linked to urgi-is/etl_script!54
Linked to urgi-is/database!16
Merge request reports
Activity
@jeremy.destin & @cyril.pommier a review xref changes is welcome
- Resolved by Raphaël Flores
- Resolved by Raphaël Flores
- Resolved by Raphaël Flores
Il faudra que j'y jette un oeil plus tard. Ca me rappel une campagne de reonmage qu'on avait fait coté data discovery il y a un an, mais dans l'autre sens (annotationId transformé en annotation_id) Il faudrait faire attentation à essayer d'être cohérent dune applis à l'autre, non ? ping @raphael.flores @celia.michotey
Edited by Cyril Pommier
added 6 commits
-
f94cc037...04ebf93c - 4 commits from branch
master
- 58e7c9b9 - Rename xref field in camelCase. Fix GNP-5564.
- 702203b0 - Ahead on xref fields renaming. GNP-5564.
-
f94cc037...04ebf93c - 4 commits from branch
1 1 { 2 "transplant": { 2 "xref": { 3 3 "dynamic": "true", 4 4 "properties": { 5 "entry_type": { 5 "entryType": { 6 6 "type": "keyword" 7 7 }, 8 "linkedRessourcesID": { 8 "linkedResourcesID": { 9 9 "type": "keyword" 10 10 } Shouldn't
groupId
be defined here too, as in the corresponding file in thedatabase
repositoty (https://forgemia.inra.fr/urgi-is/database/-/merge_requests/16/diffs#8f5bec7becd4667e8694741ece92546467e059e5) ?Well, it could be if this file was ever used. I can't find any reference to this file anywhere in the repository.
I wonder if it is not an artifact from @jeremy.destin's try to implement a Java indexer. Jeremy, do you know?
requested review from @raphael.flores
requested review from @jeremy.destin and removed review request for @raphael.flores
requested review from @raphael.flores and removed review request for @jeremy.destin
added 6 commits
-
702203b0...c5f705c0 - 4 commits from branch
master
- 62d61ab6 - Rename xref field in camelCase. Fix GNP-5564.
- 969f5264 - Ahead on xref fields renaming. GNP-5564.
-
702203b0...c5f705c0 - 4 commits from branch